<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rocket Silence &#187; quicksilver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rocketsilence.com/db/tag/quicksilver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rocketsilence.com/db</link>
	<description>Imagine Content Worth Reading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with Windows software developers.</title>
		<link>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/08/07/the-problem-with-windows-software-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/08/07/the-problem-with-windows-software-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launchbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mente Magica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicksilver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocketsilence.com/db/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The independent and smaller software developers for the Mac platform are the best in the business &#8211; they&#8217;re committed to the operating system and identify with the experience that the end-user has come to expect. On the Windows side of the aisle, this isn&#8217;t the case. Windows developers, as a community, seem horribly fragmented and&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The independent and smaller software developers for the Mac platform are the best in the business &#8211; they&#8217;re committed to the operating system and identify with the experience that the end-user has come to expect. On the Windows side of the aisle, this isn&#8217;t the case. Windows developers, as a community, seem horribly fragmented and do not identify with the same goal. Each brings a product to market to fulfill a gap they believe they can fill, however just how an application will work and interface with the system and other software is almost always an afterthought. <a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGIntro/chapter_1_section_1.html">Consistent GUI</a>? What&#8217;s that? Every program believes that it either will look as bland as possible or it will try and reinvent the wheel yielding a clusterfuck of a UI.</p>
<p>This morning, I was looking for a <a href="http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver">Quicksilver</a>-inspired Windows application to use in my coming experiment (details to come soon &#8211; I have to check with Amnesty International to verify whether or not it falls in the realm of torture), and I found a new one that tries in their own special way to do the same. <a href="http://trydash.com/home/">Dash</a> is one that really caught my attention as it seems to best capture the basic nature of Quicksilver&#8217;s search, but it led me to another facet of the Windows developer problem which is how they market their software. Take a look at the seven reasons they suggest I use Dash at their product page. Item two on that list (because everyone loves reading lists) is &#8220;Reduce Repetitive Stress Injury&#8221;. Seriously, go look, I&#8217;ll wait&#8230; Rather than the pithy &#8220;act without doing&#8221; tagline adopted by Alcor, the developer of <a href="http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver">Quicksilver</a>, Dash takes it in the opposite direction and is positioning this as a marvel of modern medicine. I say this in jest, but the problem is that it&#8217;s not addressing a problem they can solve or the strength of their product &#8211; it strikes me as something they pulled out of their butt to fill the empty space on the site.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s price. <a href="http://trydash.com/home/">Dash</a> is set at $50.00 except if you purchase now, you can get their &#8220;pre-release offering price&#8221; of $19.95 saving you $30.05. Let&#8217;s skip right past how this is on par with infomercial level &#8220;buy in the next thirty minutes and get a second free!&#8221; silliness and look at how it&#8217;s they&#8217;re establishing value. Software isn&#8217;t designed to be inexpensive and offering excessive discounts can make it seem as though you&#8217;re diminishing the worth of a product; a great example of this is <a href="http://www.panic.com/transmit/">Transmit</a> from <a href="http://www.panic.com/">Panic Software</a> for the Mac &#8211; it&#8217;s an FTP client, but it&#8217;s billed as <em>the FTP client</em>. As such, Panic doesn&#8217;t discount the software to entice those who undervalue what they offer, which is a fantastic user experience and just well-designed software. <a href="http://cyberduck.ch/">Cyberduck</a> and <a href="http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu/">Fugu</a> are free, but I saw the value in the product that made $29 palatable. What the makers of Dash are doing is, in my opinion, either mispricing their product or using used car salesman tactics to win over customers. Ignoring the fact that <a href="http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver">Quicksilver</a>, a vastly superior product to this knock-off, is completely free &#8211; Dash is selling an application at their &#8216;regular price&#8217; that pushes it into the range of what full-fledged productivity apps cost. <a href="http://www.obdev.at/products/launchbar/index.html">Launchbar</a>, a product similar to Quicksilver for Mac is priced without the gimmicks, at $19. Fair.</p>
<p>I could continue, but for the sake of brevity, I&#8217;ll end this here. Windows developers and software vendors have so much to learn from the Mac developer community about creating better applications, but even more importantly, about marketing. If it can be summed up in a sentence or two, it would be this &#8211; stop selling simple consumer apps the same way <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/duet/HA102478851033.aspx">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.oracle.com/applications/crm/index.html">Oracle</a> sell enterprise CRM software. Home users don&#8217;t want to see how many different ways you can say the same thing on your &#8220;features&#8221; page, they want to see you solve a problem they have and do it elegantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/08/07/the-problem-with-windows-software-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howto: Using OS X keyboard shortcuts</title>
		<link>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/06/14/howto-using-os-x-keyboard-shortcuts/</link>
		<comments>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/06/14/howto-using-os-x-keyboard-shortcuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicksilver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortcuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/06/14/use-os-x-more-efficiently-with-keyboard-shortcuts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keyboard shortcuts make everything easier, although some newer users don&#8217;t know how to start or see it as too arduous a task and just stuck to the trusty &#8216;ol Commnad+C and Command+V. This is a short tutorial to help you get started with some shortcuts that will make using OS X faster and more efficient.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keyboard shortcuts make everything easier, although some newer users don&#8217;t know how to start or see it as too arduous a task and just stuck to the trusty &#8216;ol Commnad+C and Command+V. This is a short tutorial to help you get started with some shortcuts that will make using OS X faster and more efficient. The first batch are universal and do not apply to any one application.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve most likely used Commnand+Tab to switch between applications on your computer, but a similar shortcut, Command+` (the key next the &#8217;1&#8242; key) will switch between application windows. This is quicker than using Expose if you just want to keep flipping back and forth between two large spreadsheets. Continuing with the window management theme, perhaps the most powerful shortcut is Command+H &#8211; hiding an application. OS X allows you to hide all and application&#8217;s windows until you call bring it back from the dock or by switching to it via Command+Tab. The main use of this is to keep your workspace clear and so that you don&#8217;t have to worry about how much you have open at any one time &#8211; for me, I have about ten to fourteen applications open at one time, some with multiple windows. Without using Command+H to hide some apps, using Expose would be unwieldly. Another related shortcut is Command+M which minimizes the foremost window. This is convenient if you want to leave some documents open but are otherwise distracting to your current work.</p>
<p>When you have multiple windows associated with an application open, you can close the current one by typing Command+W. This works in the Finder or just about anywhere else. This shortcut, combined with the four others previously mentioned tackles most of the common tasks related to window management in OS X and once you get used to them, will make you more efficient and quicker. The point of using keyboard-based shortcuts is to reduce your reliance on the mouse which in almost all cases is disruptive to your concentration and workflow.</p>
<p>In the next howto, I&#8217;ll take on the most useful and powerful application for OS X ever made &#8211; Quicksilver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocketsilence.com/db/2008/06/14/howto-using-os-x-keyboard-shortcuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

