March 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Month March 2008

Rick Astley Never Returns My Calls…

Seems like a better time than any to update on what is new. Final have come and gone, grade posting had finished (with mixed results, but that’s another story) and the new quarter at the university begins in six short days.

.. Returned home for Spring Break, have been engaging in a whole lot of nothing. I can be happy about the fact that there is a 15Mb/s connection here as compared to some places.

.. Successfully sold the 17″ MacBook Pro and settled on the newer 15″. Craigslist works surprisingly well in the Santa Barbara area; although I did have a run-in with a Mitt Romney supporter. Long story.

.. In the rush to purchase books for the new quarter, a single textbook for an intermediate accounting course costs $186.00. One hundred and eighty-six dollars. I’ll mull over the new quarter a bit later here, but, just, wow.

The lithium ions are out to get me!

In the rush to sell my old 17″ Apple MacBook Pro, I apparently failed to notice the secondary battery I purchased for it has begun to expand and break out of its casing. It’s not the rare ‘battery bulge’ that has been posted before because that usually happens with the top lifts from the casing slightly; this one seems to be far worse. Apple extended the warranty coverage on MacBook Pro batteries manufacturer prior to April 2007 a while ago due to some unrelated issues, but since this was purchased separately (not from Apple), I’m not sure how it will be handled. Should I even try or should I just dispose of it before it explodes?

MBP Battery Defect, 1 MBP Battery Defect, 2

Links: Apple Battery Warranty Program, Flickr Photos.

Are you positive?

From South Park — S12E01 “Tonsil Trouble”…

Kyle: “What part of being infected with a deadly disease do you find funny?”
Cartman: “I don’t think it’s funny.”
Kyle: “Then stop saying you’re not just sure, you’re HIV-positive.
This isn’t funny, AIDS isn’t funny, dying isn’t funny, so shut the **** up.”
Cartman: “Well, excuse me Kyle for trying to keep some optimism. Sometimes when things seem their darkest you need to try and stay HIV-positive. But if you want to be so HIV-negative all the time.”
Kyle: “Knock it off, right now! This isn’t funny! At all”
Cartman: “Are you sure?”
Kyle: “Yes!”
Cartman: “Are you HIV-positive?”

*punches Cartman in the face*

…and yes I do hate myself for finding this funny.

They're doing IT backwards

Brain-teaser time: is it wiser to invest in network upgrades or to purchase traffic-shaping equipment in a futile effort to combat the inevitable?

This is the issue I can’t seem to understand. At UC Santa Barbara, there is a pool of 200Mb of downstream bandwidth allocated for about 7,000 students. The logical response to that statement is of course, “WTF?”. Let’s run through a few hypotheticals. Assume that a tenth of the students are watching a YouTube videos or other streaming media (the average FLV stream is 300Kb/s); that consumes the entire bandwidth pool and leaves all other HTTP traffic only to slow to a crawl. Let’s assume you throw in some rogue P2P file sharing and the infinite Facebook clicks, it’s clear that it isn’t enough. The uptick in bandwidth consumption per student is not unwarranted with the shift in how individuals consume their media and it is only going to continue. Now, as a network administrator, how do you solve the issue? By spending tens of thousands of dollars (per device) for traffic-shaping equipment that prioritizes other traffic over others, deprioritizes ‘recreational’ activities to create the illusion of a functioning network.

That is the case here. A common cable equipped-houshold has access to to upwards of 10 megabits of downstream bandwidth. One can argue that this is not guaranteed, but that’s beyond the point. Let’s say that’s functional for a household of five average internet users. That would suggest the average user requires two megabits each. Let’s divide that by four since we assume most users won’t be constantly pulling data or won’t be online at the same time. By this math, a campus with 7,000 residents would need a 3.5 gigabit downstream link for acceptable performance. Compare that to 200 megabits; the current network capacity is less than one-seventeenth what it should. I don’t expect some type of miracle due to both budget and infrastructure limitations, but an honest evaluation leads on to believe that devices from Packeteer and Procera that cost upwards of $20,000 per box is not the best course of action and merely offsets the inevitable.

Links: Procera Networks, Packeteer PacketShaper, Traffic-shaping at Wikipedia.

First!

I know not of what this is, what it should be or what it will become. But alas, it begins somewhere.